You are here: Family History > Surname > Denman > Mary Denman (1842 - )

Mary Denman

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2758 1.0 Mary Denmanfemale

Birth: about 1842, at Worth, SussexCensus

Pedigree

Census Details: 1871 1881 1891 1901
   2757
Married: Edward Vigar  1864BMD
b. about 1844, at Burstow, Surrey

   27632.1 Mary Vigarfemale
Birth: about 1869, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1871 1881

   27642.2 Annie Vigarfemale
Birth: 1871, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1871 1881 1901

   27652.3 Jane Vigarfemale
Birth: 1871, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1871

   27592.4 Edward Vigarmale
Birth: about 1874, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1881 1891

   27602.5 Charles Henry Vigarmale
Birth: about 1876, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1881 1891 1901

   27612.6 Robert Vigarmale
Birth: about 1879, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1881 1891 1901

   27622.7 George Arthur Vigarmale
Birth: about 1883, at Worth, SussexCensus

Census Details: 1891 1901

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page