Sarah Leney
 
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
						   2531
									1.0 Sarah Leneyfemale
						Birth: about 1844,  at Crowhurst, Surrey
CensusPedigree
								   2530Married: 
							
John Hitchcock 
	      					 at Crowhurst, Surrey 17 Dec 1864
IGI
				b.
				about 1836,  at Horne, Surrey 
					Birth: about 1865,  at Lingfield, Surrey
Census1500Married:
									
Lizzie Razzell 
	      	about 1888
BMD
				b.
				about 1867,  at Horley, Surrey 
					Birth: about 1888,  at Horley, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1889,  at Horley, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1891,  at Horley, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1892,  at Horley, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1894,  at Horley, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1866,  at Tandridge, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1867,  at Sandring, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1868,  at Tandridge, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1870,  at Tandridge, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1871,  at Sandring, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1879,  at Godstone, SurreyCensus
 
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
							when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
							:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date; 
							:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
							if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" 
							show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), 
							and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
							are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page