You are here: Family History > Surname > Razzell > John Razzell (1868 - )

John Razzell

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   2273 1.0 John Razzellmale
2254 Father: Robert Razzell (born about 1822 at Horley, Surrey ) Census
2255 Mother: Mary Morley (born about 1827 at Burstow, Surrey ) Census
Birth: about 1868, at Horley, SurreyCensus
Baptism: 26 Apr 1868 at Horley, SurreyParish Reg

Pedigree

Additional information: Baptism 

Census Details: -:- other address/occupation
   2274
Married: Amelia Banks  about 1889BMD
b. about 1866, at Horley, Surrey

   22752.1 Bertha Razzellfemale
Birth: 21 Jan 1890, at Horley, SurreyCensus
Death: Aug 1984BMD

Additional information: Marriage Certificate 
2283
Married: Frank Holder  31 Oct 1914Parish Reg

   22762.2 Winifred Razzellfemale
Birth: about 1894, at Horley, SurreyCensus

   22772.3 Cecil Razzellmale
Birth: about 1899, at Horley, SurreyCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page