James Edward Cridland
 
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
						   1757
									1.0 James Edward Cridlandmale    
1763
					Father: 
									
George Cridland (born about 1823 at Bridgewater, Somerset
											)
											
Census 
						Birth: about 1866,  at Gravesend, Kent
CensusPedigree
								   1758Married:
									
Mary Thompson  
 at Parish Church, St George, Camberwell, London 28 Oct 1888
Mrg Cert
				b.
				about 1868,  at Sheffield, Yorkshire 
					Birth: about 1889,  at Peckham, LondonCensus
					Birth: about 1890,  at Peckham, London
Census
					Death: 1967, age: 76y.
						
BMD
							Additional information: 
Marriage Certificate 
	1064Married:
									
Rose Charlotte Razzell 
	      	 at St Antholin, Nunhead, London 08 December 1915
Mrg Cert
				b.
				1892,  at Peckham, London 
					Birth: about 1893,  at Peckham, LondonCensus
					Death: 01 Jul 1916,  at Thiepval, FranceCWGC
					Birth: about 1898,  at Peckham, LondonCensus
					Birth: about 1900,  at Peckham, LondonCensus
 
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
							when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
							:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date; 
							:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
							if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" 
							show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), 
							and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
							are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page