Richard Kirtley
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
1749
1.0 Richard Kirtleymale
1747
Father:
George Kirtley (born 03 May 1799 at Tanfield, Co Durham
)
Census 1748
Mother:
Isabella Rider (born about 1792 at Howden, Northumberland
)
Census
Birth: about 1829, at Tanfield, Co Durham
Census
Baptism: 24 May 1829 at Tanfield, Co Durham
IGI
Death: about 1890, at Gateshead, Co Durham
BMDPedigree
3038Married:
Mary Ann [not known]
before 1858
Est. from child
b.
about 1831, at Coxlodge, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumberland
d.
about 1880
Birth: 13 Nov 1854, at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Baptism: 03 Dec 1854 at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Birth: 26 Dec 1855, at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Baptism: 20 Jan 1856 at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Birth: 13 Apr 1857, at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Baptism: 21 Apr 1857 at Gateshead, Co DurhamIGI
Birth: 21 Dec 1859, at Gateshead, Co Durham
IGI
Baptism: 15 Jan 1860 at Gateshead, Co Durham
IGI
Birth: about 1880, at Gateshead, Co DurhamCensus
Birth: about 1863, at Gateshead, Co DurhamCensus
Birth: about 1875, at Gateshead, Co Durham
Census
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page