Agnes Hards
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
1518
1.0 Agnes Hardsfemale
2727
Father:
John Hards (born about 1839 at Worth, Sussex
)
Census 2728
Mother:
Emily Vigar (born about Oct 1845 at Burstow, Surrey
)
Census
Birth: 1867, at Worth, Sussex
CensusPedigree
301Married:
Albert Razzell
1890
BMD
b.
about 1868, at Horley, Surrey
d.
1828, age: 60y
Birth: about 1894, at Horley, Surrey
Census
Additional information:
Marriage Certificate
2847Married:
Reuben Grist
15 Apr 1917
Parish Reg
b.
about 1894, at Shere, Surrey
Birth: 01 Feb 1895, at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Baptism: 14 Apr 1895 at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Additional information:
Baptism Record
Birth: 16 Apr 1899, at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Baptism: 08 May 1899 at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Additional information:
Baptism Record
Birth: 08 Nov 1903, at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Baptism: 27 Dec 1903 at Horley, Surrey
Parish Reg
Additional information:
Baptism Record
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page