George Razzell
 
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
						   1495
									1.0 George Razzellmale     (twin)
Twins Ann and George married brother and sister John and Sarah Dolby
251
					Father: 
									
Caleb Razzell (baptised 08 Jan 1826 at Horley, Surrey)
											
Parish Reg 
						Birth: 1853,  at Charlwood, Surrey
Census
					Baptism: 05 Jun 1853 at Charlwood, Surrey
Parish RegPedigree
								   1457Married:
									
Sarah Dolby  
1876
BMD
				b.
				about 1852,  at Horley, Surrey 
					Birth: 11 Jul 1878,  at Beckenham, Kent
Parish Reg
					Baptism: 08 Sep 1878 at Purley, Surrey
Parish Reg
					Death: 1884,  at Croydon, Surrey
BMD
							Additional information: 
Baptism Record 
	
					Birth: about 1880,  at Croydon, Surrey
Census
					Baptism: 21 Nov 1880 at Purley, Surrey
Parish Reg
							Additional information: 
Baptism Record 
	
					Birth: about 1882,  at Croydon, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1884,  at Croydon, SurreyCensus
					Birth: about 1885,  at Croydon, SurreyCensus
 
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
							when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
							:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date; 
							:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
							if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears like, eg: "1650/51" 
							show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), 
							and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
							are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page