You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Neal > Josiah Neal (1870 - 1907)

Desborough People
Josiah Neal

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   9859 1.0 Josiah Nealmale
9854 Father: Isaac Neal    b. about 1831 at Burbage, Leicestershire
9855 Mother: Ann Nichols    b. about 1834 at Burbage, Leicestershire
Birth: about May 1870, at Burbage, LeicestershireCensus
Death: 1907, age: 37yBMD

Pedigree
   9860
Married: Elizabeth Bates  1894BMD
b. about 1868, at Burbage, LeicestershireCensus

   171822.1 Isaac Nealmale
Birth: about 1895, at Burbage, LeicestershireCensus

   171832.2 Josiah Nealmale
Birth: about 1897, at Colesworth, WarwickshireCensus

   98612.3 Sarah Ann Nealfemale
Birth: about 1900, at Irthlingborough, NorthamptonshireCensus

   171812.4 Olive Louisa Nealfemale
Baptism: 27 Mar 1904 at DesboroughIGI

   171842.5 Alice Nealfemale
Birth: about 1906, at Cailton, WarwickshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page