You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Morris > James Morris (1856 - )

Desborough People
James Morris

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   9808 1.0 James Morrismale

Birth: about 1856, at Bromsgrove, WorcestershireCensus

Pedigree
   9809
Married: Elizabeth [not known]  before 1883Est. from child
b. about 1858, at Bromsgrove, WorcestershireCensus

   98102.1 Thomas Morrismale
Birth: about 1883, at Selly Oak, WorcestershireCensus

Additional information:

   98112.2 Sarah Jane Morrisfemale
Birth: about 1885, at Selly Oak, WorcestershireCensus

Additional information:

   98122.3 Elizabeth Morrisfemale
Birth: about 1887, at Selly Oak, WorcestershireCensus

Additional information:

   98132.4 James Morrismale
Birth: about 1889, at Selly Oak, WorcestershireCensus

Additional information:

   98142.5 Edith Emily Morrisfemale
Birth: about Feb 1891, at Selly Oak, WorcestershireCensus

Additional information:

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page