You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Kilborn > Charlotte Kilborn (1841 - 1906)

Desborough People
Charlotte Kilborn

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   834 1.0 Charlotte Kilbornfemale
828 Father: Samuel Kilborn    bap. 24 Jun 1810 at Desborough    d. 12 Dec 1874 at Desborough
829 Mother: Eliza Baines    b. about 1810 at Desborough    d. 08 Dec 1880
Birth: 01 Jun 1841, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 11 Aug 1841 at DesboroughIGI
Death: 10 Aug 1906, age: 65yMI   memorial
Burial: at Maidwell, NorthamptonshireMI

Pedigree
   3626
Married: Henry Willis Cheney  about 1869BMD
b. about 1844, at Harrington, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about 1870, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 31 Mar 1871 at DesboroughIGI
14203
Married: Frederick Arthur Linthwaite  1899BMD
b. about 1874, at Nottingham, NottinghamshireCensus

   142043.1 Harold A Linthwaitemale
Birth: about Sep 1900, at Northampton, NorthamptonshireCensus

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page