You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Andrews > William Andrews (1633 - )

Desborough People
William Andrews

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   8202 1.0 William Andrewsmale

Birth: before 1633Est. from child

Pedigree
   10430
Married: (1) Ann [not known]  before 1648Derived/Burial

   8203
Married: (2) Mary [not known]  at Desborough 19 May 1649 (marriage source reads: William Andrewes of Desborow & Mary of Harrington) Parish Reg
b. before 1633Est. from child

   82042.1 William Andrewmale
Baptism: 26 Jan 1650 /51 at DesboroughParish Reg
Burial: 11 Feb 1650 /51, aged c. 3wk, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Wm Andrew the Sonne of William Andrew Jun') Parish Reg

   82532.2 Rebecka Andrewesfemale
Baptism: 11 Jul 1652 at DesboroughParish Reg
Burial: 01 Nov 1675, aged c. 23y, at St Giles, Desborough (source reads 'Rebeckah Andrewe the daughter of Will Andrew gent:') Parish Reg

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page