Desborough People
Thomas Ceybird
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
7106
1.0 Thomas Ceybirdmale
7104
Father:
William Ceybird
b. about 1822 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
d. 11 Dec 1876
7105
Mother:
Eliza Spriggs
b. about 1827 at Cottingham, Northamptonshire
d. 15 Jun 1879
Birth: about Sep 1850, at Desborough
Census
Death: 21 Mar 1914
, at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
Probate
Probate: 28 Apr 1914
executors, etc
Pedigree
7110Married:
Harriet Palmer
about 1873
BMD
b. about 1850, at Cransley, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: 1877, at Kettering, Northamptonshire
BMD17736Married:
Charles Payne
at Kettering, Northamptonshire 20 Apr 1897
Mercury
b. about 1862, at Cheddington, BuckinghamshireCensus
Birth: about 1879, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about Feb 1881, at Kettering, Northamptonshire
BMD
Birth: about Feb 1883, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Birth: about Oct 1889, at Kettering, NorthamptonshireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page