Desborough People
George Coe
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
6752
1.0 George Coemale
See also ref 7148, George Coe b. 1797. These may be the same person
2100
Father:
George Coe
bap. 29 May 1766 at Desborough
Baptism: 30 Jun 1793 at Desborough
(source reads 'George son of George and Mary Coe')
Bp Transcripts Desb
Death: 1876, age: 76y
BMDPedigreeNo proof yet that this George, son of George and Elizabeth, is the son of the George Coe who was married to Elizabeth Curtis
Baptism: 11 Jun 1815 at Desborough
IGI
Birth: 11 Sep 1818, at Independent, Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI
Baptism: 30 Sep 1818 at Independent, Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI
Birth: 12 Jul 1824, at Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI
Baptism: 06 Aug 1824 at Independent, Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI6754Married:
Thomas Trasler
1867
BMD
b. about 1822, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: 15 Sep 1826, at Independent, Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI
Baptism: 30 May 1827 at Independent, Market Harborough, Leicestershire
IGI
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page