You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Buckby > Isaac Buckby (1853 - 1887)

Desborough People
Isaac Buckby

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   5357 1.0 Isaac Buckbymale
17850 Father: John Buckby    b. about 1822 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
17851 Mother: Elizabeth [not known]    b. about 1822 at Rothwell, Northamptonshire
Birth: about 1853, at Rothwell, NorthamptonshireCensus
Death: 1887, age: 33yBMD

Pedigree
   5358
Married: Elizabeth Jane Kirby  1878BMD
b. about 1860, at Yardley Gobion, NorthamptonshireCensus

   53592.1 Ellen Caroline Buckbyfemale
Birth: about 1879, at DesboroughCensus

   53602.2 Emily Buckbyfemale
Birth: about Dec 1880, at DesboroughCensus

   53612.3 Gertrude Elizabeth Buckbyfemale
Birth: about 1883, at DesboroughCensus
17497
Married: Tom Foster  1906BMD
b. about 1882, at Cransley, NorthamptonshireCensus

   53622.4 Emma Buckbyfemale
Baptism: 28 Nov 1886 at DesboroughIGI

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page