You are here: Desborough > Surnames > Smith > Albert Smith (1858 - )

Desborough People
Albert Smith

 

Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:

Display


   17229 1.0 Albert Smithmale

Birth: about 1858, at Priors Marston, WarwickshireCensus

Pedigree
   17230
Married: Mary J [not known] 
b. about 1858, at Easton, NorthamptonshireCensus

   172312.1 Ethel Smithfemale
Birth: about 1890, at Caldecote, RutlandCensus

   172322.2 Eli Smithmale
Birth: about 1891, at Easton Magna, LeicestershireCensus

   172332.3 Elsie Smithfemale
Birth: about 1892, at Caldecote, RutlandCensus

   172342.4 Ernest Smithmale
Birth: about 1894, at Caldecote, RutlandCensus
Baptism: 07 Jul 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   172352.5 Eleanor Smithfemale
Birth: about 1897, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 13 May 1905 at DesboroughIGI

   172362.6 Hilda Smithfemale
Birth: about 1900, at DesboroughCensus
Baptism: 13 May 1905 at DesboroughIGI

 


Notes

The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.

The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.

Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier; if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.

Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.

Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51" show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650), and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating" are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.


Source Codes

top of page