Desborough People
Mary Fekin
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
13769
1.0 Mary Fekinfemale
Baptism: 18 Sep 1781 at Desborough
(source reads 'Mary Daughr of Edward & Mary Fekin')
Bp Transcripts DesbPedigree
13768Married:
Thomas Jarvis
at Desborough after Banns, 19 Jan 1802
(marriage source reads: Thomas Jarvis of the parish of Stony Stratford and Mary Fekin of this parish by Banns)
Bp Transcripts Desb
b. 1783, at Stony Stratford, BuckinghamshireEst. from marriage
Baptism: 20 Apr 1805 at Desborough
(source reads 'John Son of Thomas and Mary Jarvis')
Bp Transcripts Desb
Death: 17 Jan 1876, age: 70y
BMD
Probate: 31 May 1876
executors, etc
6737Married:
Barbara [not known]
before 1833
Est. from child
b. about 1806, at Quorndon, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1833, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1835, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Birth: about 1843, at Market Harborough, LeicestershireCensus
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page