Desborough People
John Loake
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
10380
1.0 John Loakemale
This record has been added to link wife Mary and daughter Mary as it is not yet clear which of the existing John Loakes is the correct one for this family
Birth: before 1661, at Desborough
Est. from childPedigree
10381Married:
Mary Winsall
at Desborough 27 Jan 1677
(marriage source reads: John Loake & Mary Winsall both of this psh)
Parish Reg
b. before 1661, at DesboroughEst. from child
Baptism: 22 May 1679 at Desborough
(source reads 'Mary the daughter of John Loake & Mary his wife')
Parish Reg
Baptism: 02 Apr 1681 at Desborough
(source reads 'John the Son of John Loake & Mary his wife')
Parish Reg
Burial: 01 Nov 1708 at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'John son of John Loake & Mary his Wife')
Bp Transcripts Desb
Baptism: 17 Jun 1691 at Desborough
(source reads 'Charles the Son of John Loke and Mary his wife')
Parish Reg
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page