Desborough People
Rodger Williams
Notes about the page layout and content are at the end. Change the display type here:
10277
1.0 Rodger Williamsmale
Birth: about 1653, at Desborough
Est. from marriage
Burial: 03 Apr 1677, aged 24y, at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Rodger Williams a dier buried 24')
Parish RegPedigree
10278Married:
Elizabeth Porter
at Desborough 27 Jan 1672
(marriage source reads: Rodger Williams and Elizabeth Porter both of Desborow)
Parish Reg
b. before 1654, at DesboroughEst. from marriage
Baptism: 21 Jan 1673
/74 at Desborough
(source reads 'Thomas the Son of Rodger Williams and Elizabeth ux')
Parish Reg
Burial: 19 Mar 1674
/75, aged c. 2m, at St Giles, Desborough
(source reads 'Thomas the son of Rodger Williams')
Parish Reg
Burial record: no mention of father or mother's name, so it may not relate to this child
Baptism: 27 Feb 1675
/76 at Desborough
(source reads 'Elizabeth the daughter of Rodger Williams & Elizabeth his wife')
Parish Reg
Burial: 03 Jan 1678
/79, aged c. 2y 11m, at Desborough
(source reads 'January 3 Elizabeth Williams buryed')
Parish Reg
Notes
The numbers at the right of the page are unique reference numbers.
The source follows each piece of information. If the source is underlined a full citation will be shown
when you hover over it. Click on any link to switch to that person's details page.
Estimated dates of birth (treat with caution - they could be decades out!)
:- where there is a marriage or children recorded, the date is estimated at 16-18 years before the earliest date;
:- where there is only a burial known, if the person or their spouse is described as "old", the birth is estimated at 50 years earlier;
if they are described as "very old", the birth is estimated at 60 years earlier; if neither, the birth is estimated at 18 years earlier.
Estimated dates of death are given as a visual aid to point up whether or not they survived their spouse.
Before 1752 the calendar year started on 25th March; dates where the year appears as, eg: "1650/51"
show the year as it would have been given at the time (in this example 1650),
and the year by the modern calendar (1651). Jan-Mar dates before 1752 which don't show this "double-dating"
are from secondary sources which haven't made clear which dating system has been used.
Source Codes
top of page