The Harrington Sensation

 Inquest, 27th August 1897

The Inquest on the body of the infant child found in a field near Harrington, on Thursday week, as stated in Friday's "Northampton Mercury," was held at the George Inn, Desborough, on Friday evening, before Mr. J. T. Parker, Divisional Coroner, and a jury of 18, of whom Mr. Geo. W. Sumner was chosen foreman. In anticipation of the arrival of the accused woman, Mary Ann Willis, by the 6.23 train from Kettering, hundreds of people, mostly women, assembled in the Station-road. They were however, disappointed, inasmuch as Superintendent Andrews and Inspector Butlin drove the girl over to Desborough. Superintendent Andrews and Inspector Butlin watched the case on behalf of the police.

After viewing the body, the following evidence was taken:--

George Solomon Goodwin, a tailor, living at Desborough, deposed that on Thursday afternoon about 4.30 he was mushrooming in Harrington parish. Witness was in a field in the occupation of Mr. Bamford, of Harrington. Witness was walking along the hedge-side, when witness's boy, who was some 10 yards away, called his attention to something on the ground. Witness went, and saw what appeared to be the remains of a dead infant. Witness's son turned the body over. There was no particle of dress on the remains, or any paper. There was no footpath in that field, the nearest road being 100 yards away, which led from Foxhall to Blue Cover. There was no sign of the body having been dragged, although there were marks of blood on the grass. The body was partly decomposed, and witness wrapped it up in a piece of paper and sacking and brought it to Desborough, where he handed it over to Sergeant Thomas.

Police-Sergeant Thomas, stationed at Desborough, deposed that on Thursday evening, about 6.30, the last witness, Goodwin brought to witness the remains of a dead body of an infant child, which the jury had viewed. Witness put the remains in a box, and showed them to Dr. Gibbon within half an hour of receiving them. Witness went to the spot at 6.30 on Friday morning, in company with Goodwin, and was pointed out the spot where the remains were found. Witness found blood on the grass and leaves, but no other marks as if the child had been dragged along the ground. Marks might have been obliterated by the rain which had since fallen.

Thomas Henry Hillyer, a labourer in the employ of Mr. John Walter, of Draughton Lodge, stated that last Monday week, Aug. 16, Mrs. Walters told witness to get a trap and drive a girl, named Mary Ann Willis, to her home at Harrington. Willis had been a servant at the lodge for about 12 months. Witness started with the girl about 6.30 a.m., and when about two fields away from the lodge, the girl complained of being in pain, and pressed her side. Shortly after the girl said, "This would not have occurred if I had not jumped off the steps." Directly after the girl asked to get out of the trap. Witness refused, but the girl continually repeated the request, and when on the road between Foxhall and Harrington witness allowed the girl to alight, as she said "she should be better if she walked." The girl took her parcel, and witness turned back. Witness, on looking round, saw the girl against a gate, but just after she came into the road and walked on towards Harrington. It was about a quarter of a mile from Harrington where witness put the girl down. Witness did not know what was the matter with the girl.

Mr. Henry Gibbon, surgeon, living at Desborough, deposed to being called to the Police Station, where he was shown the remains of an infant. Witness made a cursory examination of the remains, which were decomposed. He had since made a post-mortem examination. The remains consisted of the head, right arm, chest denuded of flesh, spine with the right thigh bone, and upper two-thirds of the right leg. The lower end of the right thigh bone was fractured, and the fragment united by a small piece of flesh. All the other parts were missing, and appeared to have been gnawed off. The length from the upper part of the head to the spine was 12in., and witness thought the body had been dead from eight to ten days. The sex was not distinguishable. The scalp was brownish red, and partly covered with light hair. So far as witness could see, it had been a fully-developed child. The chest contained a small portion of lung 1in. long by ½in. thick, which was evidently a portion of the right lung. The heart was entire, and witness noticed an opening between the right and left auricles. A portion of lung floated in water before compression, but afterwards sank. On removing the scalp witness found an angulra[sic] and depressed fracture of the parietal, and on opening the skull witness found the brain in a pulpy condition. The front of the neck was eaten away, and the whole of the abdomen and contents were absent. Witness was unable to say whether the child was born alive, and if born alive witness could not state the cause of death.

--By the jury: The portion of the lung was really too small for testing purposes, and the fact that it floated until compressed might have been caused by the decomposition.

Inspector James Butlin, Kettering, stated that about seven a.m. on Friday, in company with Superintendent Andrews and P.S. Thomas, he visited a field called Postman's Meadow, in the parish of Harrington. P.S. Thomas pointed out the spot where the remains had been found. After making enquiries, witness went to Harrington, where he arrested the girl Mary Ann Willis. Witness charged her with concealing the birth of a child in a field in the parish of Harrington. The girl at first denied it, but afterwards said, "I had it where it was found. It was a female child, and it was dead when it was born. I left it in the field where I had it, and came home." The girl's mother was present, and asked the girl why she did not tell her she had a baby, and said, "You only said you had a miscarriage." The girl replied, "I only told you so; I didn't like to tell you the truth." Witness drove the girl from Harrington towards Foxhall, and she pointed out the gate of the field she went into, and the direction she afterwards took. Witness drove into the field, and went to the spot where the body was found. The girl said she did not have the child where the remains were found, but pointed out a spot some 25 yards away, close to the hedge. Witness could find no trace of blood there, but was afterwards shown a piece of intestine between the two spots.

Superintendent Andrew said he had the girl Willis in custody at Desborough, but he did not wish to call her.

The Coroner said he did not propose to call the accused, although it was not generally known that a Coroner's Court was the only Court in England which had the power to call a suspected person and cross-examine them. It was a right seldom exercised, and he did not propose to do so on that occasion, because as the woman was not represented it would hardly be justifiable to make her convict herself out of her own mouth.

The Coroner, in summing up, said he had at first thought it would be necessary to have an adjournment, but after the doctor's evidence he scarcely considered it necessary. Before they could convict anyone of murder or manslaughter they must first ascertain that the person supposed to have been killed was alive. The doctor considerably shortened the enquiry by saying that he could not state whether the child had ever lived. The doctor was unable to state whether the child had ever lived by testing the portion of lung found in the body. There was a charge for concealment of birth against the woman, but with that they had nothing to do. They had only to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to connect the girl with either a charge of murder or manslaughter, and in the absence of sufficient proof the jury had to consider the verdict of "Stillborn" or "Found dead."

After a lengthy consideration, the jury returned a verdict of "Stillborn".

The domestic servant, Mary Ann Willis, charged with concealment of birth on August 16th, was brought before Mr. F. Barlow on Monday, and on the application of Superintendent Andrews, was remanded to Northampton Gaol until next Tuesday.

 

 Northampton Mercury, Friday 03 September 1897